Churchill's Sacrifice of the Highland Division: France 1940, by Saul David. Brassey's, London, 1994, xii + 276 pp.
The
viewpoint is British, but there is a sub-text of interactions with and
attitudes to the French. Such attitudes
and interactions could be complex and ambivalent: if the Scottish soldiers
expected to be greeted as heroes and saviours, they were disappointed. ‘In
strong contrast to the ecstatic welcome given to the arriving troops of the BEF
[British Expeditionary Force] in 1914, the war-weary French were no more than
lukewarm in their greetings. (p.6, in Chapter 1, 'No Heroes Welcome’). As the
author reminds us, there was of course a legacy of pervasive war-weariness and
anti-war sentiment among the French from the experiences of 1914-18. Conversely,
one would guess at a certain culture shock experienced by recruits from
close-knit Scottish Highland communities. There was apparently little
fraternisation, either organised or spontaneous, although at least one wild
night is recorded in the early days. At another level complaints occurred, as
is customary between allies, about the ‘others’ not pulling their weight.
As
a way of telling war like it was, the book certainly has interest, but will probably
hold few surprises for readers familiar with the recurrent features (near clichés
by now) of warfare narratives: confusion, irrationality, discomfort,
incompetence, as well as comradeship, often pointless heroism and occasional
'decency' between enemies (e.g. in treatment of the wounded). If this sounds
old-fashioned it conveys an impression made by the book; the author does not
deny the horrors of war, but they come over as curiously sanitised. Perhaps the
various narrators in retrospect rationalised their own experiences to some
extent.
Analysis
and comment are on the whole rather minimal, although David clearly endorses
the assertion in the title, that there was a political decision, a result of
`unsavoury horsetrading' between the French and British governments, to leave
the 51st in France with the aim of keeping that country in the war, long after
the situation had become obviously hopeless, and that aim unrealistic. Eventually,
in the brief Chapter 14 (3 pages, `Sacrificed for Nothing'), he spells out the
point that has already emerged - that Churchill himself must bear a large
measure of the responsibility - and considers it `not out of the question' that
the waste of life was deliberate, a calculated loss of expendable pawns
incurred on grounds of dubious expediency. An Epilogue reinforces this
conclusion, but ends on an upbeat note with the description of several
successful escapes, and of the reconstituted 51st 'liberating' in 1944 the town
which had been the scene of its destruction.
Many
questions are left untackled, including those in the area of war prevention. Although
some conventional attitudes are implicitly challenged, long-term consequences
of war for individuals and society are not spelt out. Effects on the close-knit
Highland communities which produced the recruits are mentioned only in passing,
and any psychiatric sequelae for the soldiers whose tales are told remain
undisclosed and unexplored. Instead, the reader may discern a kind of nostalgia
suggesting that wars aren't what they were, and a measure of reluctance to
offend those who contributed their memories. Nevertheless, this is at the very least
a useful source book for a significant episode in the history of the Second
World War, and comes complete with illustrations, maps, bibliography, notes,
glossary and index. Saul David is described as a writer of `vernacular military
history' and it will be interesting to see what he makes of his next topic, the
mutiny at Salerno, when presumably the rejection of war ideology will loom
larger.
Photograph from SY Gone By no.48, summer 2017, p.7: includes several of those captured at St.Valéry |
"St..Valéry" in floral display at Inverness Castle,
autumn 2017
(see Comment below).
|
Inverness, the Highland capital, also has a Park and Avenue named for the French
town.
|
See also: https://lenathehyena.wordpress.com/2017/08/04/no-dunkirk-hurrah-for-the-51st-highlanders/
ReplyDeleteSee also http://www.inverness-town-twinning.com/inverness_and_st_valery_en_caux_france.htm
ReplyDelete"Initial links between Inverness and St. Valery were created when the 51st Highland Division were captured there in 1940 by the Germans. The local people were very kind to the troops and the favour was returned when the Division returned in 1944, led by General Lang, and liberated the town."
More than 80% of St. Valery was destroyed in the war and a special fund was set up in Inverness in order to send aid to the stricken town, in a gesture of continuing fellowship. There have been many visits over the years between the two towns, mainly to the war graves and memorials, but twinning was not officially undertaken until 1987."
Inages relating to St. Valery and the Highland Divison can be seen at http://gotkimg.pw/sy-valery-en-Caux-1940-Highland-Division-St-Valery-En.html
ReplyDelete