Friday 15 July 2016

Conscientious Objectors from Lewis, continuing.

As well as Donald Maclennan, three other men from Lewis, as previously noted, appear on the Pearce Register. Their varying experiences in the First World War, according to the records on that database, are looked at here. In addition the Appeal Tribunal files for two of them have been consulted.

1. Donald Morrison, Garrabost.

First name(s)
Donald
Last name
Morrison
Marital status
Single
Occupation
Student (Divinity)
Age
22.1
Birth year
1894
Year
1916
Address
32, Garrabost
Address 2
Stornoway, Isle of Lewis
Local authority
Stornoway Burgh
County
Ross And Cromarty
Country
Scotland
Latitude
58.2
Longitude
-6.39
Ordnance Survey reference
NB420320
Service number
2451
Motivation
-
War Service
NCC (Non-Combatant Corps) 14.8.16 Fort George, (3 Scottish)
WO363
true
Sources
NA/WO363 - on line - incomplete
Record set
Conscientious Objectors' Register 1914-1918

As in the case of Donald Maclennan, assignment to the NCC indicates that Donald Morrison would have been granted partial exemption (ECS - Exemption from Combatant Service only) by the local tribunal, probably in Stornoway. Since there is no mention of appeal, court-martial or prison in the case of the latter, it is likely that he accepted this, rather than being among the  "absolutists" who refused any form of military service.

2. Murdo Macleod, Cromore

The Appeal Tribunal record for Murdo Macleod can be viewed as a pdf (11 pages)

Appeal against Conscription, 1916 by Murdo Maclood, Conscientious Objector - Excerpts
The file is prefaced by a handwritten letter dated 1st April 1916 protesting against the decision of the Appeal tribunal (image above).
It may seem surprising that someone who described his occupation as “Fisherman and working on the croft” should display such a degree of literacy and specialised knowledge as is apparent in the letter and statements here, but only, perhaps, to those not acquainted with islanders of his generation.

Notice of Appeal. (Stamped, Stornoway, 20-3-16).
(2) Grounds on which appeal made:
(a) On grounds of my constitutional relation to “Second” Reformation in (1638016490 overthrown at the Revolution Settlement for which reasons, principally, we as a body are dissenters from Settlement, which testimony was issued by the Reformed Presbytery, first in 1761 renewed in 1777, and again in 1842, and publicly adhered to in “Chisholm’s Defence of Reformation Principles” (1913) with which I identify myself.
(b)   Since the Revolution Settlement the “Catholic Relief Bill” contrary to “Act for preventing the growth of papacy” in King William’s First Parliament Nov.23. 1700; again “Change in King’s Coronation Oath” 1910, and finally the recent “Special Envoy for the Pope”; for which reasons, I, conscientiously, cannot serve under the Military Service Act.
Murdo Macleod        
13/3/-16         
For Local Tribunal
The Tribunal after hearing the Applicant disallowed the claim but recommended him for non-combatant service.    
Stornoway 11th March 1916
For Appeal Tribunal (Ross & Cromarty and Sutherland, Lewis Section)
            Appellant heard, Appeal refused.
Stornoway 31st March 1916.
Leave to appeal further [to Central Tribunal] was also refused, the appellant not having stated any reasons sufficient justify a further appeal.
Reasons in support of the [original] Application *
            I had accepted the testimony of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of Scotland, previous to the outbreak of this war, as published in the years 1761, 1777, 1842; and published and adopted in 1913 by that body of men with whom I identified myself, in a book “Defence of Reformation Principles”. The aforementioned position is against any part in this war.
This attitude had been taken up by us before any word was heard of this war.
Murdo Macleod                    
26/I/-16
*A longer written statement (4 pages) is on file, further explaining Murdo’s conscientious objections in terms of his religious beliefs:
God has commanded rulers to rule “in the fear of the Lord”, and has given them explicit rules in His Word… and no ruler or government has any authority (that of a Tyrant) to enact laws, and force the same on people, which are inconsistent with the rules of the Word of God.
… I therefore adhere to the position of dissent…
… No power, can maintain the Kingdoms that rebel against the Great King
… For these reasons I can’t undertake to serve under the Military Service Act.
Decision of the Tribunal: [against which the appeal was lodged]
Stornoway 11th March 1916
The Tribunal disallowed the claim. Applicant recommended for non-combatant service and enrolled at once in the R.A.M.C. [Royal Army Medical Corps].
Murdo McLean Chairman.      

His reasons, considered in detail, may be unique among COs; they are certainly unusual. The underlying principle of refusing to abdicate his conscience and responsibility for vital decisions was, however, shared by most if not all, and he turned out to be among the most resolute, as his record shows:
  • Sent to 4(R) Seaforth Highlanders  
  • Court Martial at Invergordon 10.11.16 - sentenced to 112 days hard labour
  • Central Tribunal at Wormwood Scrubs 8.12.16 - refused to accept the Home Office Scheme (administered by the Brace Committee) conditions
  • Court Martial Ripon 21.2.18 -  sentenced to 1 year with hard labour)
  • Served time in: Wormwood Scrubs; Stafford Military Prison; Winson Green Civil Prison, Birmingham.
By Jan.1919 had served 4 sentences and two years.

First name(s)     Murdo
Last name           McLeod
Occupation         Fisherman and crofter
Age        29
Birth year            1887
Year       1916
Address               28, Cromore
Address 2            Stornoway, Isle of Lewis
Local authority  Stornoway Burgh
County Ross And Cromarty
Country                Scotland
Latitude               58.2
Longitude            -6.39
Ordnance Survey reference        NB420320
Absolutist            Yes
Motivation          Reformed Presbyterian 
Military Service Tribunal                MST (Military Service Tribunal) Lewis District 11.3.16 - ECS (Exemption from Combatant Service), non-combatant; Ross, Cromarty and Sutherland Appeal 20.3.16 - refused, ECS (Exemption from Combatant Service) confirmed; Central Tribunal at Wormwood S. 8.12.16 - refused to accept HOS (The Home Office Scheme, administered by the Brace Committee) conditions
Central Tribunal                Central Tribunal Nos. W.2257 Refused HOS
War Service        4(R) Seaforth Highlanders; CM (Court Martial) Invergordon 10.11.16 - 112 days.HL (With hard labour); CM (Court Martial) Rugeley 14.6.17 - 6 months HL (With hard labour); CM (Court Martial) Ripon 21.2.18 - 1yr.HL (With hard labour)
Prison   Wormwood S.; Stafford MP (Military Prison); Winson Green CP (Civil Prison), Birmingham; By Jan.1919 had served 4 sentences and two years.
WO363 false
Sources                NA/WO86/72/111, 76/98, 80/140; FH/FSC(1916/20)/SER3 - COIB Two Year Men; NA/MH47/1 Central Tribunal Minutes; FH/SER/VOPC/Cases/5(4104); NAS/SC33/62/1/20.
Record set          Conscientious Objectors' Register 1914-1918


3. Charles Record, Stornoway, originally from Essex

In 1911 Charles was working as a "servant" while training to be a teacher, and living with his parents and sister (also a teacher) at 58 Borthwick Road, Stratford.

First name(s)     Last name           Relationship      Marital status    Sex         Occupation         Age        Birth year            Birth place
George William Record  Head     Married                Male      Decorative Japanner      47           1864       London Bethnal Green  
Annie    Record  Wife      Married                Female -              45           1866       London Stepney              
Charles Record  Son        Single   Male     Servant In Training For Teacher 19           1892       Essex Wanstead Slip      
Gladys  Record  Daughter             Single    Female Elementary Student Teacher      18           1893       Essex Wanstead Slip

Five years later he was a science teacher in the Nicolson Institute, Stornoway, living at 28 Point Street.


The whole Appeal Tribunal record for Charles Record can be viewed as a pdf here (8 pages)

Appeal against Conscription, 1916 by Charles Record, Conscientious Objector - Excerpts

The file is prefaced by a handwritten letter dated 20th May 1916 protesting against the decision of the Appeal tribunal (image of first of two pages above).

Notice of Appeal. (Stamped, Stornoway, 20-3-16 [Same date as for Murdo Macleod]).
(2) Grounds on which appeal made: My application was for total exemption on grounds of conscientious objection. By granting me exemption from combatant service the Local Tribunal apparently admitted my sincerity.
  I appeal for total exemption; so that I may not be compelled to assist in the taking of life.
  In particular I appeal for exemption from work involving the taking of the Military Oath. At present I can disobey laws which conflict with my conscience, if willing to suffer the penalties. By taking the oath I surrender that right, by solemnly promising to obey all commands of the military authorities; thereby handing over my conscience to them. This is quite impossible for me; especially since I object to the purpose for which the military organisation exists, & therefore to most of its requirements. Even though I might never receive a command which conflicted with my conscience, I cannot make the offer to discard my convictions.
Charles Record         
March 4th 1916
Reasons for the decision of the Local (Stornoway) Tribunal

The Tribunal having heard the Applicant refused the Application, but recommended him for non-combatant service.    [2-3-16]

For Appeal Tribunal (Ross & Cromarty and Sutherland, Lewis Section)
            The Tribunal having heard the appellant refused the Appeal.
Leave to appeal [further, to Central Tribunal] was also refused, the appellant not having stated any grounds to justify persuasion [?].
Stornoway 31st March 1916. [Same date as for Murdo Macleod]

Reasons in support of the [original] Application
            As a Christian I cannot undertake the responsibility of inflicting death.
My international ideals convince me that I ought not to take part in international disputes which involve the killing of my fellows.
I believe all occupations designed to assist the military authorities to partake of the same nature as actual combatant service.
[A written statement (in duplicate) accompanies the forms*].
Charles Record         
*This is on file and reinforces the points summarised here.

Decision of the Tribunal: [against which the appeal was lodged]
Stornoway 2nd March 1916
The Tribunal refused the Application and recommend that applicant be relieved from combatant service and enrolled at once in the R.A.M.C. [Royal Army Medical Corps].
John Mackenzie Chairman.     

What Happened Next
The Pearce Register gives details of the penalties Charles duly underwent in accordance with his conscience: 
  • Became an Absentee (i.e. left his place of residence), probably when the appeal was refused. 
  • Arrested 30.6.16
  • Drafted into the Seaforth Highlanders (having refused non-combatant service) 
  • Court Martial at Ripon,14.7.16 - sentenced to 1 year imprisonment
  • Served time in Northallerton (Civil Prison) and Durham (Civil Prison).
  • Came before the Central Tribunal at Wormwood Scrubs, 1.9.16 - found to be CO class A, genuine
  • Referred to Brace Committee for work under the  Home Office Scheme
  • In work centres at Wakefield, 12-10-16, and Dartmoor, 28.8.17 and 21.2.1918.
[Murdo Macleod - see above - was also sent to the Seaforths, and court-martialled at Ripon]

First name(s)     Charles
Last name           Record
Occupation         Science teacher, Stornoway School Board
Age        24
Birth year            1892
Year       1916
Address               28, Point Street
Address 2            Stornoway, Isle of Lewis
Local authority  Stornaway Burgh
County Ross And Cromarty
Country                Scotland
Latitude               58.2
Longitude            -6.39
Ordnance Survey reference        NB420320
Motivation          Religious [and Internationalist]
Military Service Tribunal                MST (Military Service Tribunal) Stornoway Burgh 2.3.16 - refused; Ross, Cromarty and Sutherland Appeal 20.5.16 - refused, granted ECS (Exemption from Combatant Service) with a recommendation to RAMC; Central Tribunal at Wormwood S. 1.9.16 - CO class A, to Brace Committee
Central Tribunal                Central Tribunal Nos. W.1023 Class: A - Genuine
War Service        4 (R) Seaforth Highlanders; CM (Court Martial) Ripon 14.7.16 - 1 yr imprisonment.
Magistrates Court            Arrested 30.6.16
Magistrates Court comments     Absentee
Prison   Northallerton CP (Civil Prison); Durham CP (Civil Prison)
Work Centre      HOS (The Home Office Scheme, administered by the Brace Committee) 12.10.16 at Wakefield; at Dartmoor 28.8.17 and 21.2.1918
WO363 false
Sources                Tribunal 27.7.16; Cumbria RO(Carlisle)D/Mar/4/97; NA/WO86/71/38; Sanctuary Autograph Book WYB8/2/1; NA/MH47/1 Central Tribunal Minutes; Not found in NA/WO363; FH/SER/VOPC/Cases/7(1559); NAS/SC33/62/1/1;
Record set          Conscientious Objectors' Register 1914-1918


Monday 11 July 2016

Not All Like Lambs to the Slaughter

A First World War Conscientious Objector from Lewis
Court-martialled on 11th July 1916

This blog has already looked at the cost to the Isle of Lewis of the First World War, and also at the situation of Conscientious Objectors (COs) to that conflict, in Britain generally and the London Borough of Ealing more particularly. Up until recently it has looked as though there were few if any Leodhasachs who took the courageous and perilous path of conscientious objection when conscription was introduced in early 1916, although there were many who applied for exemption on other grounds, particularly connected with their occupations: the hardship that would ensue if they were prevented from continuing their normal working lives, and/or the importance of those lives in the national context (e.g. food supply). It is with such cases that the Appeal Tribunal records from Lewis, among the few sets fortuitously to have survived, are mostly concerned. Not all applicants for exemption would have chosen or been allowed to take their cases to appeal if refused at the first hearing.

One young man, however, who was recognised as a "Class: A - Genuine" CO was Donald McLennan (MacLennan), a 20-year-old student from Balallan in the Lochs district. His is one of the only four records that come up on searching for "Stornoway" or "Isle of Lewis" on the nearly 17,500-strong Pearce Register, available via the IWM Lives of the First World War. (This does not necessarily mean there were no others; research on the subject is still on-going, with new names being discovered all the time).

What happened to Donald according to the record is as follows:
  • Conscripted into the NCC (Non-Combatant Corps) Fort George; 
  • NCC (Non-Combatant Corps) (2 Scottish) Hamilton CM (Court Martial) 11.7.16 [This was routine for COs who refused to obey a military order]
  • Sentence to  6 months HL (with hard labour), commuted to50 days in Barlinnie CP (Civil Prison)
  • Prison   Barlinnie CP (Civil Prison) 13.7.16 - 'Liberated by Military Authorities 26.7.16'
  • HOS (The Home Office Scheme, administered by the Brace Committee) Transfer to Army Reserve Class W 16.3.17
The NCC means that Donald would have been granted partial exemption (ECS - Exemption from Combatant Service) by the local tribunal, whether at home or wherever he was studying at the time. His court-martial indicates that this was not acceptable to him, so he may have lodged an appeal for absolute exemption that was refused.

His case came before the MST (Military Service Tribunal) Central Tribunal which was set up at the end of July at Wormwood Scrubs prison in London as part of the evolving policy for dealing with COs nationally. The Central Tribunal found him to be a 'Class: A - Genuine' CO, suitable for referring to the Brace Committee administering the Home Office Scheme under which COs were sent to work camps.

Maclennan         Donald —          —          1914-20               First World War               Great Britain RNR
First name(s)     Donald
Last name           McLennan
Marital status    Single
Occupation         Student
Age        20
Birth year            1896
Year       1916
Address               Balallan
Address 2            Stornoway, Isle of Lewis
Local authority  Stornoway Burgh
County Ross and Cromarty
Country                Scotland
Latitude               58.2
Longitude            -6.39
Ordnance Survey reference        NB420320
Service number                ??
Motivation          -
Military Service Tribunal                MST (Military Service Tribunal) Central Tribunal at Wormwood S. 4.9.16 - CO class A, to Brace Committee  
Central Tribunal                Central Tribunal Nos. W. 1128 Class: A - Genuine
War Service        NCC (Non-Combatant Corps) Fort George; NCC (Non-Combatant Corps) (2 Scottish) Hamilton CM (Court Martial) 11.7.16 - 6 months HL (With hard labour) com.50 days Barlinnie CP (Civil Prison)
Prison   Barlinnie CP (Civil Prison) 13.7.16 - 'Liberated by Military Authorities 26.7.16'
Work Centre      HOS (The Home Office Scheme, administered by the Brace Committee) Transfer to Army Reserve Class W 16.3.17
WO363 true
Sources                NA/WO363/M852 - incomplete file; NA/WO86/70/197; NAS/HH31/29/1 - COs in Scottish Prisons July 1916; NAS/HH31/29/6 - Central Appeal Tribunal 1.9.16; NAS/HH21/70/54 Barlinnie CP (Civil Prison) 1916; NA/MH47/1 Central Tribunal Minutes


https://search.livesofthefirstworldwar.org/search/world-records/conscientious-objectors-register-1914-1918

Above: Transcription from the Pearce Register

1911 Census record for MacLennan family at 5, Balallan
John      MacLennan        Head     Married                Male      ?58         1857       Crofter, Weaver                  
Mary     MacLennan        Wife      Married                Female ?54         1855       Weavers Wife   
[3 older daughters have left home]
Patrick  Peter MacLennan            Son        -              Male      22           1889       working on Croft           
Donald John       MacLennan        Son        -              Male      16           1895       School   
Donald  MacLennan        Son        -              Male      14           1897       -              
Margaret Maggie            MacLennan        Daughter            Female 13           1898       -       School
Catherine Kate  MacLennan        Daughter             -              Female 10           1901       -     School
Ann MacKay       Sister-in-law [5 Balallan 1901]     52           Servant (Domestic) at no.5 in 1901

All are listed as having been born in Lochs, Ross & Cromarty, Scotland.        
 
Donald John b.1895 would have been 21 in 1916 and is therefore the more likely to have been the CO, rather than his younger brother Donald. (It was not unusual, of course, for siblings to share a first given name; they would be called after different people and would be known by different forms of the name, initials or nicknames.)

1901 Census record for MacLennan family at 5a, Balallan
1901
John      MacLennan        Head     Married                Male      44           1857       Weaver               
Mary     MacLennan        Wife      Married                Female 46           1855       Weavers Wife   
Patrick  MacLennan        Son        -              Male      12           1889       Scholar 
Iabella   MacLennan        Daughter             -              Female 11           1890       Scholar 
Johana  MacLennan        Daughter             -              Female 10           1891       Scholar
Mary Ann            MacLennan        Daughter             -              Female 8              1893       Scholar 
Donald John       MacLennan        Son        -              Male      6              1895       Scholar 
Donald  MacLennan        Son        -              Male      4              1897                   
Margaret             MacLennan        Daughter             -              Female 3              1898         
Catherine            MacLennan        Daughter             -              Female 0              1901       

The other three known COs from Lewis in the First World War were:
  • Donald Morrison, a Divinity student, 22, from Garrabost
  • Charles Record, 24, a Science teacher in Stornoway
  • Murdo MacLeod, 29, a fisherman and crofter from Cromore.
More on their stories later.

Postscript
The tragic story of Malcolm Martin is not included with the above, since his appeal was made on the grounds not of conscientious objection but on the basis of his having made his life elsewhere and not having been "ordinarily resident" in Britain at the relevant time for conscription. This was not allowed. He survived the hostilities but was drowned on the Iolaire.


Malcolm Martin, SC33/62/1/34 p2
“The appellant is a shepherd who came to Lewis on a visit shortly before the outbreak of the present war. He was not therefore ‘ordinarily resident’ in Great Britain on August 15 last and the Military Service Act does not apply to him. Further, he was engaged in his occupation as a Shepherd at Punta Arenas, South America and when making said visit to Lewis his intention was and is to return to Punta Arenas where he has a troop of horses and other property – all his property and interests are situated there and Some are now requiring Appellants personal attention”.

As he was not ordinarily resident and his business remained in Argentina, Malcolm applied for absolute exemption on grounds of serious hardship. His appeal was refused on 31 March 1916 “in respect that applicant doesn’t come within the exceptions specified in the first schedule to the Military Service Act 1916”. - from Case Studies on Scotland's People.

Like Donald Maclennan, Malcolm Martin was from Balallan (a place with a certain tradition of dissidence and activism - well within living memory in 1916), so it is is quite probable that they knew each other.

********************
Not all of one mind...
MY MOTTO
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori
But not being patriotic, I’m afraid I don’t agree.
For if I had a motto I am sure that it would be

Melius et dulcius est – semper ludere.
(Latin: melius = better; dulcius = sweeter; semper = always; ludere = to play)
 From:-
On the other hand:-




From 


Mind you, in their way, the COs may be said to have had something of the same spirit.

Friday 1 July 2016

Contre les Essais Atomiques Français 1966: Photos and recollections

"Marche de la Paix", an Illustrated Memoir

(partly based on an unpublished account by one of the participants, 30 or so years later)
See also: http://smothpubs.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/fallout-from-french-nuclear-tests.html


Supposed to have been inscribed
Marche de la Paix 1966
 

The French nuclear tests in the Pacific in 1966 did not lead to much audible outcry on the other side of the Channel. One group which took action was the Committee of 100, diminished and changed since the days of the Trafalgar Square mass sit-downs but still committed to direct action and civil disobedience in the cause of opposing nuclear weapons, whether "capitalist" or "workers'". A protest march was planned, to go from London to Paris in early July, timed to finish on the Champs Elysées on the 14th, Bastille Day. An advertisement was placed in papers like Freedom and Peace News asking for volunteers to take part.

A mighty handful?

Possibly at the start, in London
It was rather short notice for such an undertaking at a difficult time of year, and only a few responded to the call from different parts of the country, including two students from Aberdeen. They arrived in London to meet together with the then secretary of the C100, who was herself a participant as well as organiser. The march set off on a sunny morning, headed for Brighton (the shortest way to the coast) and the Newhaven-Dieppe ferry crossing. Along the way, bystanders - when there were any - contemplated the placards adorned with Polynesian flowers, exotic names (Muroroa) and slogans in French, with the customary stares and occasional comments, generally showing mere curiosity rather than the hostility that Ban-the-Bombers often experienced and expected in south-east England (criticism of the French going down well, perhaps). Local supporters provided food and drink, overnight accommodation and sometimes company for a bit of the road. In Brighton there was also a meeting and a social under the auspices of the Labour Party left-wing and CND. Hospitality and comforts were appreciated but not without a degree of embarrassment, given that the Labour Party (Wilson's Labour government) and mainstream CND were prime targets of C100 militancy and criticism respectively.
... plus one behind the camera. 
Not quite the full hundred.
Contre Toutes les Bombes

Similar situations, only more so, arose in northern France when some - not all - support came from Communist mayors and local groups, although the C100 had been vociferous in opposing CP influence in CND (and elsewhere), and had even taken the message to Red Square. From arrival in Dieppe, however, the ambiance around the marchers was upbeat and encouraging, almost like a holiday in spite of their seriousness of purpose. Through Normandy to the outskirts of the capital they were surrounded by a fluctuating but by comparison with the English side substantial body of supporters and well-wishers including socialists, anarchists and the MCAA (Mouvement contre les Armaments Atomiques). These variously rallied round with al fresco meals and at least two more elaborate dinners, places to stay - an unoccupied flat, an empty hostel, their own homes - and morale-boosting reinforcement on long stretches of dusty road, frequently rounded off by a "petit tour de la ville", not always a welcome culmination to a tiring day.

On arrival in Dieppe, a walk round the town with French supporters
(the first of many such "tours" in towns en route)
A roadside respite


Il pleut.
(The weather was good most of the way.)
Medals & Mayors

Such a degree of popularity, even if still among a minority, was quite a novelty for the British protest marchers, who were not entirely at ease with it, being mostly of a libertarian persuasion and tending to expend a lot of their political energy on denouncing the traditional left. Some of the French of course shared their views, including a number of young men who were shortly to come up for conscription, and a certain amount of political discussion naturally went on along the way and in the evenings. Walking alongside others who felt strongly enough to make the same protest from a differing viewpoint was not much of a problem either, until their appreciation, if still not uncongenial, began to look like going somewhat over the top. All the same, just as it would have been difficult and discourteous to refuse the "petits tours", it was hardly on the cards to turn down glasses of Pernod and slap-up meals, try to evade the odd champagne reception organised by a communist mayor of a small town, or decline ceremoniously presented souvenirs, notably an ashtray (remember those?) from "Oissel-sur-Seine, la cité des fleurs" and a medal "offert par la ville de Louviers" (no-one had quite got round to getting it inscribed on the back).

A civic welcome frae the toun at Louviers, 
led by the mayor, with great hospitality
On the eve of le quatrorze juillet

At the end of a fortnight's trek, the protest was on schedule to culminate as planned in a calculated attempt to gain maximum publicity with a strictly illegal demonstration down the Champs Elysées, challenging the patriotic fervour building up to the French national day. Up until then there had been few or no hassles from the police, and any opponents among the public had kept their distance. Realising that arrests would become inevitable, the demonstrators delegated one of the British to attend a press conference so that their version of what they were doing and why would be heard, whatever else happened. The rest and a larger number of French, (who of course were risking rather more, especially in the case of intending or actual draft-dodgers), proceeded with the demonstration. They were duly scooped in by the forces of law and order, but in a controlled fashion: "Une à la fois, et sans brutalité", an officer was heard to instruct, no doubt with diplomatic considerations in mind.

An early aerial view of Paris:
Avenue des Champs 
Elysées leads to the Arc-de-Triomphe (centre)
Not quite a jour de gloire, pas si mal quand même

After a couple of hours spent by the arrestees in a large enough, though bare and overcrowded cage or wild-west-type cell in a police station, another of the British contingent, with about enough knowledge of French to do some interpreting, was summoned to hear their fate. Evidently not wanting to create a set of martyrs or get into international complications, the authorities let them off with a warning that if the offence was repeated, any British who took part would be deported, while the French would have to pay a fine. Since no-one had any ambition to become a martyr and they felt they'd made their point, this was agreed as understood, and the freed protestors returned in modified triumph to the scene of the crime, this time to unwind, reunited with their spokesperson and others. It was not quite all over; a petition against the tests was handed in to the Elysée palace for the attention of the head of state (de Gaulle); it's not known whether he attended to it at all, certainly the tests were far from over.

Accommodation was provided for two of the marchers by this couple in Paris
Thirty years later, the French state embarked on yet another series of nuclear tests in the South Pacific, and found themselves faced with a barrage of opposition from world opinion, on a scale and at a level for which they seemed to be unprepared. The widespread media clamour, diplomatic repercussions, calls for boycotts and mass protests within France and elsewhere contrasted markedly with this small group effort of 1966, perhaps suggesting that the world had moved on in some respects at least. And this time the tests were finally called off.

Previously on this blog: